Policy Recommendations for building future audiences 

Introduction: Building Future Audiences – A Small Market Perspective

Resources for small film markets are limited. This limitation concerns numbers of films produced and their budgets, but also the ‘natural’ limit to their potential audiences in their domestic market. Consequently, the competitiveness of small film markets depends on their ability to use their limited resources efficiently to reach the domestic audience across release windows and to access an international pool of audiences as a reliable supplement to domestic viewers or even a strategic focus for expansion. Understanding audiences’ motivations to watch films from small markets, their barriers to going to the cinema and (unused) potential for exports is necessary to enhance the competitiveness of small market films. This document aims to give recommendations for film policy on national and European level and for the practice of stakeholders in distribution and exhibition that aim to build audiences in and for small markets.

The background of these recommendations is the audience research carried out within the Crescine project.[1] Findings from these different parts of the research are reported in the previous volumes of the State of European Film (2024, 2025), reports (Chervyakova et al., 2025) and academic publications: Gracio et al. (2025), Damasio et al. (2025), Primorac (2025), Damasio et al. (forthcoming)[2] and Pita et al. (forthcoming)[3]. Instead of recounting these findings of Crescine’s audience research, this document focuses on the implications of these results for policy makers and practioners in distribution and exhibition. The boxes in the beginning of the chapters briefly summarize methods, point to published findings and highlight the main stakeholders addressed.

The goal of building audiences for small market films is shared across all sections of this document. We perceive audience building to be a holistic task that encompasses increasing cinema-going in general and attendance of domestic film in particular (section 1), increasing knowledge and awareness of small market film at home and abroad (section 2) enhancing the visibility of small market films on VoD (section 3), audience orientation in funding, production and distribution (section 4), the use of AI in audience building (section 5) and building film literacy in educational contexts (section 6). This holistic view seeks to maximise synergies between activities across the value chain and exhibition windows, but also entails potential conflicts between individual goals. Such conflicts relate, for example, to the diverging needs and profiles of national and international audiences, or to strategic choices of whether to maximise reach among existing audiences or to diversifying to access audiences that are not (yet) reached. We are also aware that the limitations of small markets’ resources limit the scope of audience building measures. Whether potential benefits of adjusting policies and practice outweigh costs not only depends on resources within small markets, but also on the individual market’s profile.

The Crescine project has sought to distill challenges to European small film market’s competitiveness from in-depth analysis of seven small markets: Croatia, Denmark, Flanders (in Belgium), Estonia, Ireland, Lithuania and Portugal. These markets (of course) differ in many ways for example in their levels of cinema-going and VoD market development, their reach among international and domestic audiences, their funding, production and distribution landscape (see Nielsen et al. 2024) as well as in their access and awareness of domestic film (see State of European film 2024). Still, the overall challenge of how to use limited resources efficiently and strategically remains the same for all. Therefore, this recommendation report also includes good practice examples from the small markets throughout and a dedicated showcase (section 7) of effective initiatives for raising awareness of small market film, boosting cinema attendance or increasing film literacy. Some of these initiatives have been mentioned by audiences or stakeholders during the research phases, others are highlighted because the researchers within the seven national markets see them as potential models for addressing similar challenges in other small markets. This recommendation report aims to support a dialogue among stakeholders in small markets and at European level about identifying shares as well as diverging challenges and learning from each other to address them.

References

[1] For an overview of the methods see: https://app.flourish.studio/visualisation/26653182/edit

[2] Damásio, MJ, Materska-Samek, M., Kotlińska M., Vaz de Sousa, M., Chervyakova, T., Graça, A.R., Pita, M., Grácio, R., Gerner, A.,(forthcoming) “Enabling factors for AI policymaking in the film and AV sectors: the case of small European markets” Journal of Digital Media and Policy.

[3] Pita, M.M., Damásio, MJ, Grácio, R. and Graça, A.R. (forthcoming) “Cineflux: Using AI to Scale Qualitative Film Audience Research”. In P.N. Vicente, C. D. Burnay, M. Frey & P.-S. Chow (eds), Artificial Intelligence in the International Film and Audiovisual Media Industries. Routledge.

Summary of Recommendations

This list summarizes central recommendations that are elaborated on in the subsequent chapters of the report, where stakeholders can also find further considerations and concrete examples useful when seeking to implement change.

1) foster increased cinemagoing & attendance of domestic films by

  • leveraging the power and pleasure of the cinema as a physical space for social experience through event-oriented programming, loyalty schemes or clubs where domestic film has a special place and thereby contributes to spreading knowledge and awareness of small market film.

  • recognizing and addressing the diverse needs of audiences that are hard to reach for cinemas. Strategic focus on accessibility of the cinema not only meets needs of diverse audience groups but also activates their broader social circles and add visibility for the cinema as an inclusive space through strategic partnerships with community organisations. Based on experimental pilot screenings in Portugal, the full recommendations report highlights targeted measures for attracting different age groups (children, young adults & seniors), people with disabilities (blind & low vision, deaf & hard of hearing, neurodivergent audiences) and audiences with cultural/linguistic roots outside the country where they visit cinemas (expats & migrants).

2) increase awareness of and engagement with small market film at home and abroad by

  • considering strategically the differences in the profiles, tastes and practices of domestic and international audiences. This means conducting in parallel support measures for films with a clear path in either direction, while harnessing the potential of the few films from the small European markets that manage to appeal to both audiences at the same time.

  • building capacity to offer a broad genre portfolio to enable access also to niche audiences at home and abroad not only in the cinema but also on VoD.

  • supporting and leveraging the power of formal and informal cultural intermediaries (e.g. cinephile communities, cultural diasporas) for the circulation of small market films among international audiences. With economic challenges to newspapers or other outlets of professional film criticism, online communities, engaged cinephiles as well as stakeholders with cultural mandates (e.g. educational or cultural institutions) increase in importance for bringing audiences in touch with small market films that cannot draw on large-scale marketing campaigns or awareness internationally.

  • developing specific programmes and filmic literacy initiatives that promote small market film amongst broader and segmented audiences such as younger audiences or retired people.

3) support the effective circulation and visibility of small market films on VoD by

  • broadening the perspective on VoD distribution to acknowledge the different roles national, regional, niche and global platforms fulfil in the market and the different ‘values’ domestic film from small markets has on them

  • developing specific policy measures to ensure that the prominence of European small market film in VOD platforms catalogues is ensured. At the same time, it is necessary to address discoverability not only through prominence measures on platforms but broader investment in awareness and knowledge that spans across film-literacy initiatives, marketing, presence on third-party film platforms and communities as well as traditional film criticism.

4) enhance audience orientation within small film ecosystems by

  • building knowledge and understanding of audiences among stakeholders in production, distribution and funding through better accessibility of audience data (quantitative & qualitative). This necessitates establishing audience-orientation as a transversal policy goal to enable creators to understand how different groups perceive stories, themes and references and be able to target audiences appropriately.

5) shape a fair, responsible and effective use of AI in audience building by

  • investing in levelling the access and increasing data quality of AI-based audience development that small market players have a harder time to access and benefit from. Without targeted support mechanisms, the risk of widening the gap between large and small markets persists, leading to unequal opportunities for visibility and audience reach.

  • recognizing the disadvantages of small-language communities in finding adequate representation in training data and AI-based recommender systems that threaten the diversity of filmic output

6) build film literacy in secondary education by

  • combining classroom‑based instruction in film grammar and technical competences, for example, film grammar and active viewing strategies with initiatives that promote exhibition attendance and collective viewing experiences, thereby linking technical competence to civic and cultural participation

7) be inspired by good-practice projects in other small markets! 

The recommendations in section 1 are based on findings from Crescine Task “Piloting alternative forms of audience engagement to attract new audiences”. The task aimed to identify effective strategies for fostering audience engagement in on-site cinema venues to enhance the theatrical experience. This task was focused on recognising barriers to cinemagoing and understanding its values across various socioeconomic contexts. The task involved experimental pilot screenings in Portugal. The demographics considered include: 1) older adults, 2) children, and 3) young adults. Additionally, four sessions have been dedicated to specific accessibility concerns: 1) expats and migrant communities in Portugal with limited language skills in their country of residence, 2) deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) individuals, 3) blind or low vision individuals, and 4) neurodivergent individuals. For more details on methodology and findings see Chervyakova et al. (2025).

Based on the experiences from the experimental pilots and patterns in participants’ responses, we have compiled the conclusions in these recommendations. The current recommendations are designed for stakeholders in cinema exhibition as strategic actions to improve the cinema-going experience and align it with expected value. These recommendations are general, with some directed towards particular demographics.

1.1 Recommendations for increasing cinema-going in small European markets

1.1.1 Cultivating group experiences to enhance the social aspect of cinema-going

The report on task 7.5 demonstrated the acknowledged social value of the cinema-going experience. To effectively leverage cinema’s inherent capacity for social interaction, venues can proactively work with audiences to improve the group experience. This involves strategies that move beyond individual ticket sales to promote collective attendance as a primary driver.

Enhancing pre- and post-screening communal spaces (general), such as lounge areas or dedicated discussion zones, can facilitate social interaction, transforming a film viewing experience into a more comprehensive social event that adds unique value to the cinema beyond watching one film. As an example, the film center Batalha, in Portugal, develops special programs involving families and migrant communities, among other groups, creating a constant audience and adding social and cultural value.

Thinking of “who” and not “what” in programming (general). The films, both new releases and curated retrospectives, are still the essence of the cinema venues’ in the communication of their value proposition. However, due to competition from other modes of watching film, on-site cinema-going may incorporate sociality and unity, drawing inspiration from people united by social causes, relationships, communities, and hobbies. In Ireland for example, cinemas host a parent and baby programme facilitating access to people with very young children or a Cinema Book Club for people who want to talk about cinema and literature, film adaptations, etc.

Establishing cinema clubs for systematic community(s) engagement (general). To foster deeper engagement and systematic involvement of diverse social groups, the creation of cinema clubs is highly recommended. These clubs, united by specific causes, genres, or cultural interests, can provide a structured framework for regular cinema attendance.

Examples include foreign language film clubs, documentary clubs, classic film societies, or clubs focused on films addressing social issues. This initiative not only cultivates loyal audiences but also establishes cinema as a community hub, fostering a sense of belonging and shared identity that encourages sustained involvement and consistent patronage across diverse social demographics.

Increasing the frequency of cinema-going experiences for children through classes or after-school activities, combining two intentions: education and entertainment. Children participating in the focus group mentioned that they appreciate their time with friends in the entertainment setting. The school, along with the cinema venues, can engage children not only with class-related materials but also with entertainment that could be a helpful component in their personality development. Those screenings must add value, compared to multiplex or home viewing, namely, questions and answers at the end of the screening.

Examples of school-cinema programmes can already be found in many of the small markets in the Crescine consortium, such as Tartu Elektrikteater school cinema in Estonia, the Danish Film Institute’s programme Med Skolen i Biografen, the Portuguese National Plan for Cinema and its project O cinema está à tua espera with ca. 650 schools participating, the Lithuanian Cinema Bus for school children in grades 1-12, or the Irish Film Institute’s Film Education programme.

Creating children’s cinema clubs that foster the atmosphere of autonomous time spent with friends in a safe and secure environment. These clubs reflect what children look for in cinema sessions: a sense of bonding, an immersive experience, and a chance to escape their routine. This is already practiced in Denmark, for example, often on local level (e.g. Århus Børnefilm, Ry Børnefilmklubber).

The cinema-going experience is very often a part of the night out. Hence, considering spaces that facilitate cinema as a social space for young adults (i.e., open-air sunset cinema, bar, additional entertainment), adding extra factors for socialising and film discussions, creating a multi-layered social event. An example is the Lithuanian initiative Cinema under the Stars described in the Good Practice section (section 7).

For older audiences, the issue of a lack of partners to attend the film was raised. This environment can vary across countries, with different approaches to the activities of older adults and their socialisation. Specific communication could inspire older adults to treat the cinema-going experience as a social gathering to engage with new people could be a possibility to overcome this barrier. Active theater cooperation with retirement houses and adapted sessions to this audience could increase the coming of groups. In Ireland, for example, Silver Screen for over 65s offers reduced price and coffee for older audiences.

1.1.2 Providing pricing flexibility

Implementing tiered group discounts for larger parties (e.g., more than five individuals) can incentivise shared outings, and family tickets, making cinema a more attractive and affordable social activity.

Recognizing young adults as the most price-sensitive, but inclined to use cinema-going as part of socialising, it could consider discounts on group tickets (i.e., for groups of 4 or more people). Implementing a tiered discount system for group cinema attendance (e.g., for groups of 6 or more) can be a potent incentive to increase attendance. This strategy directly addresses the social aspect of cinema-going, encouraging shared film-viewing and easing the financial burden.

Despite no explicit mention of a financial barrier among older citizens, the price has a non-negotiable character. For those who find the price high, this barrier is inevitable. Moreover, the benefits of loyalty programmes have been discussed during the focus group. Hence, we recommend establishing pricing measures for such groups. For instance, the “suspended coffee” analogy when one can pay in advance for strangers’ ticket in need voluntarily can be applied to tickets that allow to attend the cinema.

1.1.3 Delivering additional value through experiences

To increase the desire to commit to on-site cinema viewing, venues must provide extra experiences that may only take place within the cinema setting. This involves curating bespoke events that elevate the standard film screening. It could be beneficial to redefine the cinema as a multi-functional social space, not merely a venue for film viewing.

Include thematic screenings that group films by genre, director, era, or cultural significance.

Integrated hospitality bars and lounges offering gourmet food and drinks to encourage pre- and post-screening socialising,

Atmospheric screenings that use unique locations to enhance the cinematic experience, which can also be transferred to non-traditional venues.

Launching a series of post-film discussions as curated events with competent moderators or subject-matter experts would lead to dialogue on the film’s themes and correlated topics. Offering exclusive content —such as director’s cuts, behind-the-scenes footage, or Q&A sessions —available only in cinemas would create a compelling reason for audiences to commit, transforming the film-viewing experience into a premium, multisensory event.

1.2 Recommendations and best practices for accessible cinema sessions per target group

1.2.1 Sessions with migrant and expats groups

Cinemas can benefit from greater consistency in the availability of non-English-language films with English subtitles. For original non-English-language films, comprehensive English subtitles are essential across all screenings to cater to the extensive and diverse international community, which is a potential audience for these films. Expat cinema – weekly screenings of foreign language films with additional English subtitles. This initiative enhances the versatility of the cinema experience, moving beyond an over-reliance on English-market films for these groups.

To improve the discoverability and awareness of these linguistically diverse film offerings, cinemas can benefit from implementing targeted promotional strategies through direct collaboration with expatriate communities. This includes partnering with, for example, expat social groups, international schools, and cultural institutes. This approach fosters community engagement and positions cinemas as inclusive cultural venues. Galleries Cinemas in Brussels, for example, offers

1.2.2 Sessions with Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) and blind and low-vision audiences

Best practice for organising sessions for hearing DHH audiences

Providing Subtitles in the local language helps to meet needs of deaf and hard of hearing-people who prefer text over Sign Language.

Implementing Sign Language Video in for specific cinema screenings for children or adults who are not proficient in written language. Sign Language Video is already explored practicev in public service broadcasters, i.e in RTP in Portugal, SL video with 1/18 (+/-) of the screen size, without background, and at the lower right of the screen (spectator point of view), seems to be a good balance between Deaf audiences’ needs and “screen disturbance” for hearing persons; using a black bar at the bottom of the screen helps to highlight the LGP video and minimise conflict with the film’s image, while still leaving space for the SDH subtitles.

  • It is useful to ensure that shorter children can see the entire video.

  • A preference for having a deaf person in charge of the SL video, as the presence of a deaf person would inherently validate the national sign language and reinforce its acceptance within the deaf community.

  • Avoid terms without a direct sign equivalent, particularly if the film is aimed at children. Check vocabulary with a deaf sign language teacher to ensure clarity and linguistic adequacy, especially if the film is intended for children. Keep descriptions concise and reinforce those texts in the SL video.

  • In large groups (i.e., schools), ensure the presence of a Sign Language interpreter during preparation, during travel to the cinema, and at the screening session.

  • Do not neglect the sound because, even if experienced differently from a hearing person, it is an added value for DHH children.

  • Before the film begins, show an introductory video about the story, characters, and relevant terms to contextualise the movie.

  • Include an interval if the film is longer than 60 minutes.

  • Provide teachers with materials containing key vocabulary from the film in local language Sign Language and written local language, to aid in understanding the content and familiarisation with main concepts.

  • Facilitate a discussion after the film, with a deaf facilitator or with interpreter support, where students can share their opinions, clarify doubts, and deepen their understanding of the film’s themes.

  • Provide visual resources, such as comic strips or illustrated sequences of the narrative’s key moments, to reinforce memory and promote reflection.

Best practice for sessions with blind and low vision audiences

  • Audio Description: In commercial cinemas, prioritise the use of headphones for audio description.

  • Promote awareness sessions for blind people in schools and similar settings, with audio description integrated into the film’s main sound. This model requires careful audio description to avoid conflicts with the overall sound.

  • Avoid audio description coinciding with speech or dialogue.

  • There appears to be a preference for an “impartial descriptive” model, where audio description describes the visual aspect without adding interpretations (e.g., “Maria smiles” versus “Maria is happy” — the latter introduces an interpretive element that is best avoided).

  • Avoid repeating phrases like “you see...” before the descriptive text. The repetition of this term during the pilot session was deemed redundant and tiring.

Best practice for screenings for blind and low vision children

  • Consider adjusting the age range for films based on narrative and dialogue density. It’s advisable to validate this with reference institutions specialising in the education and support of blind children.

  • Adjust vocabulary to the comprehension level of the target age group; avoid overly technical or abstract terms.

  • Encourage specific training for audio describers working with children’s content, focusing on pedagogy, child development, and cultural sensitivity.

  • In case of complex themes or unusual contexts (historical, social, or other) consider either a brief introduction to prepare the younger audiences for the film, as used successfully by film festivals.

Supplementary Session Materials

  • To aid comprehension during the session, provide a plot summary, an introduction to the main characters, and a description of the setting before the session. This can be done in person or by sending an audio file in advance for listening at home.

  • To support the mental construction of the film’s world, whenever possible and appropriate to the film’s format, provide tactile exploration materials. Examples include miniature character models, raised maps of the settings, or embossed illustrations.

Best practice for sessions with neurodivergent individuals

  • Using subtitles for films is generally preferable. Even when participants do not have auditory accessibility needs, subtitles can significantly enhance understanding. This is because subtitles help to create a stronger connection between the audio and the action on screen, allowing viewers to follow the narrative more easily.

  • Include an intermission during the session to provide a comfort break, essential support, and an opportunity to take a pause and receive feedback on any concerns from the audience

  • Provide an opportunity to choose from various seating options, highlighting them with pictorial information and signs. Clearly communicate what each seating option entails at the beginning of the screening. If feasible, offer additional sensory overload accommodations, such as optional noise-canceling headphones, which should be readily available.

  • Keep the cinema room doors open to ensure easy exits and reduce fear and anxiety associated with closed spaces.

  • Do not completely turn off the lights, as this eases movement within the cinema room. It increases visibility and comprehension of the space, providing necessary comfort.

  • Reduce the overall volume of the film, while being mindful of the varying levels of sound between dialogues and special effects or music. This will help maintain clarity during conversations and ensure that key moments stand out without overwhelming the audience

  • Provide training for staff on the diverse aspects of sensory processing and communication styles to enhance accessibility during general sessions. This will help create a more inclusive environment for all participants.

1.2.3 Strategic recommendations for improving accessibility of cinema venues through strategic collaborations with organisations

Addressing the critical issue of accessibility for non-English language films and audiences with special needs requires a two-pronged approach: securing dedicated financing for accessible screenings and establishing systematic collaborations with relevant organisations. These partnerships can facilitate the effective promotion of accessible screenings directly to target audiences, ensuring that diverse communities are not only catered to but also actively informed and encouraged to participate in the cinema experience. This reliable proactive approach underscores a commitment to inclusivity, broadening the cinema’s reach and societal impact.

For expats and migrants from English and non-English speaking cultures, increasing the advertising of planned screenings and expanding the range of non-English films with subtitles. This addresses a significant market gap and helps increase audience and exposure for European cinema. Partnering with foreign embassies, cultural centres, and international student associations can ensure that promotion reaches the intended audience directly.

For blind, low vision, and DHH individuals, systematic collaboration with organisations can provide valuable feedback on accessibility features, assist in promoting screenings directly to their members, and ensure the most appropriate experience, as screenings will be supervised and advised by professionals. Train cinema staff to be knowledgeable and empathetic regarding the needs of these audiences, ensuring a welcoming and supportive environment.

Establish formal partnerships with local senior centres and retirement communities, or others providing support to older adults. These collaborations can facilitate group outings, provide discounted tickets, and help promote dedicated screenings. As mentioned, the partnership must be systematic, planned, and heard to make a difference and attempt to create a change in the public’s cinema-going habits. Our experiment demonstrated participants’ interest, provided that specific conditions were met, including preliminary scheduling for the event’s inclusion in the program and responsiveness to the audience. The creation of systematic, pre-scheduled, and managed activities can foster this audience’s active involvement in preferring the on-site cinema experience and support the development and enforcement of the socialisation potential presumed as a value of the experience. As a supplement to the recommendation, we emphasise the importance of supervision of the employees from the organisation supporting older adults, as it contributes to the dialogue before the sessions (to select the film or the session), to assist the audience during the session, as they can create the atmosphere of trust and comfort for some participants.

1.2.4 Recognizing the potential of incorporating accessibility into general sessions

Participants emphasized the importance of being able to share their cinema experiences with loved ones and having easy access to the latest film releases. They expressed a desire for cinema venues to not only provide special sessions tailored for individuals with specific needs but also to integrate inclusive practices into their regular programming, not just in an exceptional setting. Hence, these sessions with Sign language and audio description could be scheduled and explicitly marked in the programming so the audience is aware of alterations made to the film. This way could create a more accessible experience and solidarity of the audience with these communities.

To achieve this, it is recommended that cinemas incorporate in some prime-time screening sessions features that are essential for individuals with specific accessibility needs such as Sign Language videos and subtitles, as well as audio descriptions, available with or without headsets., etc. By creating such an inclusive environment, cinemas can accommodate diverse groups, promote joint experiences among people with varying conditions, and increase the audience removing accessibility barrier. This inclusive approach not only fosters tolerance and awareness of our differences but also enriches the cultural fabric of the city, ultimately contributing to a more welcoming and diverse community for everyone. Making these adjustments can help ensure that all individuals have the opportunity to enjoy films together, creating shared memories that strengthen social bonds.

Recommendations for Increasing Awareness of Small Market Cinema at Home and Abroad

by Cathrin Bengesser, Rita Gracio & Manuel Damasio

2.1 Recommendations for increasing the domestic cinema audience for films from small markets

Recognizing the continued importance of the cinematic window. The cinematic window is vital for the success of European films. Research by the European Audiovisual Observatory (Tran, 2025) shows that most European films attract more viewers in cinemas than on VoD and emphasizes that domestic films achieve the highest share of the audience in the cinematic window compared to their share of viewing time on SVoD. Crescine’s research highlights the role of cinemas in building awareness for new films and national cinema.

To harness this potential, domestic films need reliable cinema slots at attractive times for socializing. Promotions focused on the cinematic window can further boost attendance as can initiatives for increasing cinema-going (Section 2.1) Local connections, such as familiar settings, stars, or themes, motivate audiences to watch local films and are therefore useful starting points for audience engagement campaigns. Cinema clubs and community-building efforts can strengthen interest and create regular audiences for domestic cinema (see Bengesser & Damasio, 2025).

Raising awareness of new releases and building/updating knowledge of domestic film. Limited awareness of new releases and outdated perceptions of domestic cinema are key challenges, especially in countries with low domestic film admissions. Many non-viewers hold prejudices based on specific types of film (e.g., family comedies, historical drama about specific events), rather than drawing on the full portfolio of domestic cinema. Since audiences’ pathways to content vary widely no single approach can solve awareness issues. However, all efforts should aim to make domestic cinema a “safe bet” for target audiences (see Bengesser & Damasio, 2024).

Awareness is raised by a variety of sources, often in combination with one-another: word-of-mouth, reviews, advertising, transmedia connections, special programming, festivals and awards, third-party platforms, etc. Effective measures include clear promotion of a film’s genre, mood, and themes in posters and trailers, as well as highlighting filmmakers, stars, and accolades. While some audiences were skeptical towards over-promotion of certain films, credible sources like cultural journalism and third-party platforms (e.g. IMDB, Letterboxd) provide valuable information and enhance word-of-mouth recommendations. Supporting domestic films on these channels and platforms builds not just individual success but broader awareness of national cinema.

A strategic focus on a diverse repertoire of genres and topics and target audiences. Audiences in small markets perceive a lack of diversity in genres and topics in domestic cinema, even though they acknowledged that small markets face budget limitations (see State of European Film 2024). Comedies often perform very well with domestic audiences (see Gracio et al., 2025) because of their cultural resonance (many drawing on known national IP) and their ability to bring audiences together, but were also perceived as formulaic and they usually do not manage to travel abroad. Many also highlighted genre and topic as key factors in deciding whether to watch a film in the cinema or on streaming, though views differed on which genres or topics were better suited for each: Some participants of our focus groups, for example, perceived visceral genres like action to be more suitable for the cinema, while others enjoyed the immersion in stories and topics raised by dramas. Funding policies that aim to build capacity for a wider variety of films can expand the offerings available. This includes strategic co-productions for more expensive (e.g. action) or niche genres (e.g., horror). Special screenings of current and older films in rare(r) genres can help attract niche audiences and raise their awareness of domestic productions. Niche genres like horror are also able to reach international audiences, particularly on streaming where the few small market films in this profile already circulate well (see Bengesser, 2024). Co-productions, particularly for niche genres can help expand small market genre profiles in an economic way and with an eye to international markets.

2.2 Recommendations for increasing the international cinema audience for films from small markets

Acknowledging the different audience and taste profiles of domestic and international audiences is a prerequisite for efficient film funding and distribution strategies. Very few films from small countries manage to be popular with domestic and international audiences at the same time. Though these few films are highly successful, aiming for both audiences at once is not a sustainable strategy. Our audience research indicates that elements that make films recognizable for international audiences differ from those that make them relatable for domestic audiences. These assessments highlight the need for policies that are tailored for local audiences and tailored for international circulation in parallel. Currently, small European markets lack a clear strategic outlook on exports, which large markets practice (Kostovska, 2024) and some small markets hardly export at all (Øfsti & Nielsen, 2025). EU initiatives aimed at increasing international distribution of European works are key in filling this strategic gap, but small markets – particularly those with small company sizes and low levels of national public funding in the AV industry (see DG Connect, ECORYS and Technopolis, 2025: 60, 67) face challenges in benefitting from MEDIA support funding. To foster such strategic development, existing national funding schemes could be segmented between projects mainly targeting domestic or international audiences. This may include prioritizing national funding of projects that have a clear exploitation model. For such planning, accessibility of audience profiles and data is key (see section 4).

Genre-oriented strategies emerge as another key element in broadening the reach of films from small markets (see also Øfsti & Nielsen, 2025). Because of small markets’ limited resources and often limited export track record, small market films can hardly draw on internationally recognizable stars and expensive IPs and expensive genre features that attract international mainstream audiences to European film. Animation and genre-film like crime, family, sci-fi and horror, however, feature strongly among the successfully exporting film, including VoD distribution. Strategic capacity building for these types of film (see 2.3) could help small markets to diversify their filmic repertoires and build their own niche in international trade rather than competing for big budgets and IPs with Europe’s large markets.

Support for festival participation can boost distribution and awareness among cinephile audiences. Festival participation and awards (particularly at Cannes and the Academy Awards) can boost international recognizability for individual films among more cinephile international audiences, but small markets differ greatly in their levels of festival participation (Øfsti, 2024) as well as in their strategic focus on festivals. Therefore, European support for festival participation has continued importance for harnessing the distribution potential that comes with festivals, while the combination with European support for market participation and networking promises to maintain an eye towards competitiveness and sustainable business models. The latter is of importance because pursuit of artistic prestige alone, which per se does not guarantee any financial return, can be risky and ultimately unsustainable. This calls for specific festival strategies tailored to the repertoire and policy agendas of the individual market.

Harnessing the role of cultural intermediaries in bringing small market films to international audiences. As for domestic audiences, word of mouth plays an important role in bringing films to international audiences. Participants in the international focus groups mentioned relying on knowledgeable friends, online communities, information on platforms like IMDB as well as on traditional reviews and film criticism for finding out about European cinema to watch. Because small market films can usually not build on a large international audience to spread the word, the identification of the diverse cultural intermediaries within and beyond the film market per se is relevant to the international distribution of small market film, by exposing non-domestic audiences to small European markets’ films, and there is potential to be leveraged, for example through partnerships, networks or continued relations.

Cultural intermediaries can be individuals, acting online as “produsers” (e.g. cinephiles facilitating online conversations about foreign films; the use of hashtags by social media users that congregates film lovers around film genres, topics or film origins) or individuals acting in their organizations (e.g. teachers and professors using films for teaching non-media topics – eg: European films shown in South Korean universities in a class on philosophy in films).

Cultural intermediaries can also be institutional actors – from embassies organizing film festivals, showcasing films at relevant events, to universities’ international exchange programs (eg. Erasmus programs), where films can be presented for the learning of a culture, fostering cross-cultural learning and intercultural communication. Also, transnational organizations, from (non-media) business companies to NGOs, can use films and series to foster transnational leadership and multicultural teamwork (e.g. watching series Turn of the Tide in Spain, to learn Portuguese language, in an Iberian company). Collaborations between cultural intermediaries and cultural infra-structures in different sub-cultural and creative sectors can be a fruitful avenue to expose international film audiences to small European film markets’ products (e.g. film screenings/talks at libraries or museums).

Recommendations for Audience Building for Streaming

by Cathrin Bengesser

3.1 Recommendations for increasing the circulation of small market film on VoD

The cinematic window is essential to the success of European films (see 2.3). However, video-on-demand (VoD) services also play a key role as an additional revenue source, as a platform to broaden audience reach, and as a tool to build awareness and recognition for films from small markets, both locally and internationally. Unlike cinemas, VoD platforms have no limits on availability and can offer access to a wider range of small market films, especially for international audiences. This limitless availability, however, often amplifies challenges related to awareness, making it harder for individual titles and small market cinema to gain visibility.

Policies seeking to increase the circulation of small market film on VoD are welcome, but effective only when combined with efforts to increase their discoverability at large, which should not be restricted to prominence in algorithmic or curated recommendation systems. The following recommendations are therefore aimed at securing access and discoverability more broadly.

Recognize the tiered structure of VoD services in Europe. The Crescine project has shown that the VoD availability of films from the project’s case countries varies greatly (see also FIDA: VoD). Particularly on the global SvoD platforms small market films are hardly present, especially for their home audiences. For domestic audiences, therefore, local broadcaster VoDs are the more reliable providers of domestic cinema alongside more niche offers like curated streaming services (e.g. Filmin in Portugal) or the public library streaming service Filmstriben in Denmark. Nevertheless, the few films that made it to particularly Netflix garnered attention because of convenience or social buzz around VoD releases.

Different strands of streaming platforms (global, national, niche) meet different audiences and different practices. Supporting the effective circulation of small markets films on VoD means supporting their circulation across different types of platforms without creating undue competition for rights and attractive windows among them.

National (public service) broadcasters have a particular and often also politically mandated role (e.g. Denmark, Portugal) in circulating domestic cinema. This role could be strengthened on national level for example with obligations to invest in licenses to domestic film. In Estonia films that have received public funding are required to secure domestic VoD distribution and most often local and regional players ensure this accessibility.

Niche and curated services including or even focusing on domestic cinema (see best practices below) meet needs of cinephile audiences and can substitute for lacking local independent cinema structures. While they cannot be expected to achieve scale beyond cinephile audiences inclined to watch European content, they can be supported in deeper penetration of this market. To meet audiences and create meaningful exposure for small market films, platforms in this category need support in building knowledge about themselves in their audience community and in fostering their habitual use.

On globally operating SVoDs, the AVMS quota for European works ensures a presence of European content. Films from small markets and their audiences, qua their smaller scale, can benefit less from such presence obligations in conjunction with the smaller pay-off of platform localization in small markets. Domestic sub-quotas can be a tool to ensure the (domestic) VoD circulation of film, but they come with a risk for small markets because they can create a distorted competition for the limited pool of attractive rights (titles + windows) between small market services and large players as well as between the cinematic and VoD window. This competition does not apply to the same degree, though, when it comes to the international circulation of small market film.

3.2 Recommendations for increasing the visibility of films from small markets on VoD in globally operating VoD catalogues

To translate catalogue presence into discoverability, audiences need to be able to come across, find and be informed about content. Our research has shown that the way audiences discover and choose films to watch is often unique and complicated. Visibility on VoD interfaces (prominence) counts, but having a film prominently available on a VoD platform is not enough. For the domestic market, awareness and knowledge built in the cinematic window (see section 2.3) also pays off in the VoD window.

Particularly films with limited cinematic release or no cinematic distribution in new international markets need additional support either from platforms themselves or distributors to find audiences. The case of successful VoD originals that garner attention of both home and international audiences shows how prominence and promotional efforts by platform can attract and concentrate viewership, but even if they require direct investment from streamers small markets will only ever get this effect for very few productions that then have a disproportionate power to shape the image of their national cinema. Regulatory requirements for domestic/European content in promotional campaigns (e.g. Ireland) is a promising way to level the playing field also for licensed content, but it comes with challenges in regulatory monitoring.

Audiences, both domestic and international, often struggle to find more films from small markets or works by their creatives. Alongside aggregator sites like justwatch, which is supported by Creative Europe, national initiatives like wheretowatchireland (see good practice below) have developed, but they need awareness among audiences to become meaningful pathways for small market content. In practice audiences often stay within their preferred VoD platforms, which limits what they can discover especially when small market film is hardly represented there.

Particularly among international audiences, global streamers’ original content enjoys a recognizability unparalleled by licensed content. Since levels of original commissioned small market films on global platforms are low, small markets can hardly benefit from this recognizability. Direct investment obligations can bring this attention to commissioned content, but risk coming at the expense of the visibility of a more diverse range of licensed content. While prominence definitions under the AVMSD address the searchability of ‘European content,’ they do not suggest searches or filters by specific countries (e.g. the services’ target country). Because only few films from small European markets are available on global SvoDs and because domestic content is vital for local players, an option to increase discoverability without creating undue competition over rights would be supplementing search results and recommendations within the platform with pointers to aggregator sites where similar content could then be found on competing services.

Recommendations for Increased Audience Orientation in Production and Distribution

by Sten Kauber

4.1 Recommendations for strengthening audience research and data infrastructures

Research shows audiences’ motivations and barriers to European content differ by platform and cohort (see Damasio et al, 2025), but in contrast to cinema admission numbers (e.g. accessible via the EAO’s Lumiere databases) knowledge and data about these differences in streaming is not accessible to most stakeholders in small media markets (e.g. producers, distributors, funders, researchers, film institutes), not least because such commercial data is expensive. Establishing a national audience observatory (with EU/regional links) to harmonise and systematically track cinema, VOD and demographic data, would enable evidence-based targeting and exportable insight. Accessible data tools for audiences already exist for example at the Danish Film Institute.

Qualitative insights revealed market-dependent reasons for why people skip national and small market titles. Funding ongoing mixed-methods studies (surveys, ethnographies, focus groups, test-screenings) on national levels is necessary so that cultural cues and access issues inform development and outreach activities in production and distribution.

4.2 Recommendations for integration of audience(s) in production

Because in many markets, audiences report inconsistent and ineffective marketing that reduces interest in national films, increased efforts in marketing strategies around small market films are necessary. Requiring concise engagement plans in funding applications can help here, if they cover the whole production and release processes, target segments, cultural positioning, outreach channels and simple milestones in order to boost audience reach and engagement.

Early audience testing helps creators understand how different groups perceive stories, themes and references. Supporting test-screenings, concept labs and diverse advisory panels during development can strengthen audience orientation across both creative and promotional processes, allowing filmmakers to refine narratives, positioning and marketing messages to better connect with intended audiences.

4.3 Recommendations for establishing audience orientation as a transversal policy goal

Audiences act as co-producers of meaning and value. To foster this understanding of audiences policy guidance reframing audiences as active cultural agents and align funding criteria across agencies would legitimise comprehensive engagement and outreach investments that foster vibrant film culture.

Audience engagement and reach are dependent on complex processes of decision-making and information seeking, stressing the importance of various key players in the local ecosystems. Creating cross-sector audience development grants that link producers, distributors, exhibitors and cultural/media/educational organisations for joint campaigns and pipeline initiatives contributes to audience-oriented activities across and beyond the value chain.

Audiences’ ambivalent attitude towards the industry’s engagement and outreach efforts might indicate that they lack audience-focused skills. Funding targeted training, fellowships and incentives for hiring audience designers and audience-development officers helps to ensure that research is translated into meaningful audience-oriented practice.

To move from intent to impact, it is necessary to embed audience indicators (reach, diversity, engagement quality, discoverability) in programme evaluations and use results to reorient funding toward approaches that lower barriers and build sustained and diverse engagement.

Recommendations for the Use of AI in Audience Building

by Marta Materska-Samek & Gosia Kotlinska

5.1 Economic and technological obstacles

The adoption of AI tools for audience building in the European film sector remains uneven, primarily due to economic and technological disparities between large and small markets. While major production and distribution companies benefit from access to robust data infrastructures and advanced analytics, smaller players often lack financial resources, digital capacities, and trained personnel required to implement AI solutions effectively.

From an economic perspective, the cost of data acquisition, model development, and integration of AI-based tools (such as audience segmentation, predictive analytics, or personalization engines) represents a significant entry barrier for independent producers and small distributors. These stakeholders rely heavily on public funding, which traditionally prioritizes content production rather than data innovation or audience intelligence systems. Without targeted support mechanisms, the risk of widening the gap between large and small markets persists, leading to unequal opportunities for visibility and audience reach.

From a technological standpoint, the fragmentation of data ecosystems across Europe hampers the scalability of AI solutions. Limited interoperability between national databases, inconsistent data collection standards, and restrictive privacy regulations further constrain the use of audience data for predictive modeling and personalization. Smaller institutions frequently depend on third-party IT suppliers that do not share user data, preventing them from developing their own insights into audience behavior. Moreover, the absence of common frameworks for ethical and transparent AI use in cultural sectors discourages experimentation and cross-border collaboration.

5.2 AI-Driven Audience Analytics

AI’s capabilities in data analysis have revolutionized how market actors understand and serve their audiences. Advanced analytics platforms now enable real-time mapping of audience behaviors, trend identification, and sentiment analysis by aggregating vast datasets—ranging from social media reviews to streaming platform engagement. There is a need on the market for ethically designed AI - agents, which “combines qualitative insights from curated focus groups with quantitative AI-driven analysis of public data,” (Damasio et al., forthcoming)[1] ultimately providing a “strategic compass that not only maps current audience dynamics but also guides policymakers toward desirable futures” (Damasio et al., forthcoming).[2] By leveraging hierarchical topic modeling and content analysis, these AI-tools can uncover hidden content clusters and audience biases, supporting evidence-based interventions, especially in underrepresented markets.

Notably, while commercial recommender systems (RS) such as those of Netflix or YouTube drive personalization, they often “amplify biases, reduce content diversity, and lack transparency” (Damasio et al., forthcoming).[3] In contrast, ethically designed AI systems explicitly foreground public value, enabling more inclusive promotion strategies and the identification of neglected audience segments.

5.3 Advancing Inclusivity and Equity Through AI

A core tenet of CRESCINE’s findings is the imperative to pursue AI-enabled inclusivity in the film market, especially for small and minoritized linguistic communities. If left unchecked, algorithmic curation risks “marginalizing small-language films in discovery algorithms or generating outputs lacking cultural diversity, exacerbating digital inequalities” (Damasio et al., forthcoming).[4] Policy must therefore prioritize representational fairness, including the training of AI models on diverse datasets attuned to European linguistic and cultural plurality.

AI also opens new avenues for inclusive programming and audience engagement—alternative venues in small markets utilize data-driven insights to design participatory community experiences and to showcase diverse film repertoires, actively promoting openness or the perception thereof. In this context, the human-centered perspective in both content creation and promotion, emphasized by various stakeholders interviewed in the CRESCINE initiative, remains paramount.

To overcome these challenges, policy frameworks should consider dedicated funding for AI-based audience intelligence projects on European level, data-sharing infrastructures for small market stakeholders, and capacity-building initiatives that promote digital literacy among film professionals. These measures can reduce inequalities in technological access, foster innovation, and enable more sustainable and inclusive audience development strategies across Europe’s diverse audiovisual ecosystems.

5.4 Summary of recommendations for audience building using AI

The following recommendations outline key measures focusing on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for audience data analysis, personalized promotion, and fostering inclusivity in the film market:

Regulatory adaptation: Update legal definitions of authorship and copyright to reflect hybrid human–AI creative processes, and require that all AI-driven audience analytics and marketing rely on GDPR-compliant, consent-based data use.

Transparency and accountability: Mandate disclosure of AI use in content curation and marketing, including clear labelling of AI-supported services and mechanisms for independent algorithmic auditing.

Capacity building and AI literacy: Invest in digital literacy and AI education for creative professionals, bridging creative and technological skills and emphasising participatory policy design, practitioner agency, and the mitigation of algorithmic bias.

Inclusion-by-design: Require impact assessments for AI recommender systems, support tools tailored to local market needs, and incentivise models that prioritise diversity and positive discrimination in favour of underrepresented and neglected creators.

Dedicated funding lines for AI innovation: Establish targeted funding schemes (e.g. via Creative Europe, national film institutes, regional agencies) for AI-based audience research, data analytics, and personalisation tools adapted to small and medium-sized stakeholders, encouraging partnerships between audiovisual institutions and technology developers.

Shared European data infrastructures: Develop secure, interoperable and ethically governed European audience-data platforms, building on initiatives such as the Common European Data Space for Cultural Heritage, to enable benchmarking, collective learning and cross-border audience insights in line with GDPR and the AI Act.

Public–private partnerships: Encourage collaboration between film institutions, research centres and technology companies through policy incentives (e.g. tax relief, co-financed pilots) to co-develop accessible AI tools, cloud-based analytics and open-source algorithms that support audience segmentation and recommendation systems.

Equitable access and ethical standards: Integrate fairness, accessibility and AI Act–aligned ethical requirements into all relevant funding, licensing and support frameworks, ensuring that publicly financed AI applications in the cultural and audiovisual sectors uphold transparency, inclusivity and strong privacy protections.

References

[1] Damásio, MJ, Materska-Samek, M., Kotlińska M., Vaz de Sousa, M., Chervyakova, T., Graça, A.R., Pita, M., Grácio, R., Gerner, A.,(forthcoming) “Enabling factors for AI policymaking in the film and AV sectors: the case of small European markets” Journal of Digital Media and Policy.

[2] Damásio, MJ, Materska-Samek, M., Kotlińska M., Vaz de Sousa, M., Chervyakova, T., Graça, A.R., Pita, M., Grácio, R., Gerner, A.,(forthcoming) “Enabling factors for AI policymaking in the film and AV sectors: the case of small European markets” Journal of Digital Media and Policy.

[3] Damásio, MJ, Materska-Samek, M., Kotlińska M., Vaz de Sousa, M., Chervyakova, T., Graça, A.R., Pita, M., Grácio, R., Gerner, A.,(forthcoming) “Enabling factors for AI policymaking in the film and AV sectors: the case of small European markets” Journal of Digital Media and Policy.

[4] Damásio, MJ, Materska-Samek, M., Kotlińska M., Vaz de Sousa, M., Chervyakova, T., Graça, A.R., Pita, M., Grácio, R., Gerner, A.,(forthcoming) “Enabling factors for AI policymaking in the film and AV sectors: the case of small European markets” Journal of Digital Media and Policy.

Recommendations For Building Film Literacy In Secondary Education

by Manuel José Damasio

Building film literacy in secondary education requires a comprehensive approach that addresses its multiple dimensions: creative production, critical analysis, and mastery of the technical vocabulary specific to cinematic practice. Our recommendations are informed by an analysis of successful national and regional initiatives, Plano Nacional do Cinema in Portugal, and the interesting case of the State of São Paulo in Brazil, which plans Circuito Spcine, both of which foreground cinema exhibition and link film literacy to the habitual experience of viewing films in theatres and comparable public venues. The stakeholders targeted by these recommendations are both educators, particularly bodies that define educational policies and agendas at secondary level education, and cultural stakeholders, particularly the ones responsible for the preservation of cultural filmic heritage and the owners of theaters and other public venues apt for cinema exhibition.

These cases demonstrate that cultivating regular, communal film‑going practices strengthens the pedagogical aims of film education by situating learning within broader social and cultural contexts. A good example is the already mentioned Portuguese initiative “O cinema está à tua espera” that offers free and curated sessions to film schools in proper theaters, or the Brazilian program SPCine veloxtickets - that allows underprivileged groups to have access to regular tickets at a large discount or even for free in specific theaters via a dedicated app and a subscription.

Accordingly, film literacy should be framed as a literary and visual language that yields measurable learning outcomes—comprehension, analysis, evaluation, and production—while also functioning as a mode of sense‑making, individual discovery, and social cohesion.

Effective secondary‑level provision, therefore, combines classroom‑based instruction in film grammar and active viewing strategies with complementary out‑of‑school programmes that expose students to the cultural and communal affordances of cinema. Tailored curricular interventions should integrate close analysis of form and technique with practical production

tasks and should be implemented in parallel with initiatives that promote exhibition attendance and collective viewing experiences, thereby linking technical competence to civic and cultural participation. This overarching approach is particularly important for small markets where cinema can and should play an ever more important and cultural role on such relevant issues as the preservation of local languages and cultures or the improvement of bridging social capital in opposition to bonding social capital that closes a community upon itself and diminishes cultural participation.

Good Practice Case Studies from Small Markets

Croatia – Filmska pismenost – Developing film literacy in cooperation with the educational sector

By Jaka Primorac 

Through its Film Literacy Portal, the Croatian Audiovisual Centre collects all activities of the Centre aimed at long-term improvement of cooperation between the audiovisual and educational sectors in the Republic of Croatia, with the aim of increasing the quantity and quality of film teaching—i.e., with the aim of encouraging and promoting film and audiovisual literacy. Thus, the portal contains information on all the activities, events, and (AV and printed) materials related to the development of film literacy. It aims to empower all those involved in children’s education to actively seek knowledge and information about film and its potential to positively influence children’s artistic development. It promotes film literacy events, offers educational materials, and other online resources.

Denmark – Biografklub Danmark – Building cinema-going habits through a discounted curated program

By Cathrin Bengesser 

Biografklub Danmark offers a 50% discount on tickets to a curated list of ten films per season, which club members access by paying a fee of approximately €17 and then redeeming discount coupons in any of the country’s 168 cinemas. The program encompasses about one film per month. New domestic releases are most prominently featured alongside selected European titles and a few US films. Members of the club also get information about upcoming films on the website, the club’s app, an annual magazine, and through the club’s mailing list. Our qualitative research with members of Biografklub in Denmark has revealed that the club generates awareness and becomes a trusted source of information on upcoming films. The program helps to ritualize members’ cinema-going, particularly when groups of friends hold memberships together and going to the cinema becomes an occasion to meet. The club has existed for 30 years and has more than 200,000 members in Denmark to date. It is run by a fund set up jointly by the Association of Danish Distributors and the Danish Cinema Union.

Estonia – Arkaader.ee: A VoD platform for national film

By Sten Kauber 

Arkaader.ee is a joint initiative of the Estonian Film Institute and the Film Archive of the National Archives of Estonia and operates as an SVOD and TVOD platform dedicated to Estonian cinema and audiovisual heritage, improving access, discoverability, and film literacy while building audiences among all types of viewers. The platform aggregates feature, documentary, and animated films and newsreels, presents curated thematic collections on the main site to guide discovery, and offers a teacher interface (edu.arkaader.ee) that makes all titles available to educators for unrestricted classroom use. Teachers can show full films or clips, add tasks, create and publish curated learning objects (collections of clips and resources), link materials to school subjects, share content with students, and use produced and teacher-created learning materials that are constantly added to the Arkaader ecosystem. By lowering access barriers, supplying ready-made educational materials, and offering curated pathways into the catalog, Arkaader embeds national cinema into curricula and everyday viewing, strengthening long-term engagement and media literacy across generations.

Flanders – Cineville Pass – Unlimited access to local arthouse & independent cinemas

By Paul Hammoud

A successful and active initiative for building and developing audiences in Flanders and Belgium is the Cineville Pass. It is a subscription model for arthouse and independent cinemas that was first introduced in the Netherlands in 2009 and extended to Belgium in 2022. It provides unlimited access to participating venues for a fixed monthly fee and is restricted to cultural and arthouse exhibitors. The initiative initially took root in Brussels, where its success was facilitated by the geographical concentration of cinemas such as RITCS, NOVA, Cinematek, and Palace. This spatial proximity allowed subscribers to easily access a range of venues and encouraged frequent and diverse cinema attendance. In 2023, Cineville expanded into Wallonia, and in September 2024, the model was introduced in Flanders with seven cinemas.

A defining characteristic of Cineville is its cooperative business model. Participating cinemas are members of a collective structure, which ensures joint decision-making and a shared distribution of revenues. This arrangement has fostered stronger dialogue and collaboration between exhibitors, thereby reinforcing the local film culture ecosystem. From the perspective of audiences, the pass encourages more adventurous viewing habits: subscribers are more inclined to attend films outside the mainstream canon, as the subscription format reduces the perceived financial risk of trying new or challenging works. Data indicates that the initiative particularly resonates with younger demographics; a significant share of subscribers is under 35, representing 65% of the base.

Another initiative worth mentioning is the 1+1 action run by the Flemish Audiovisual Fund (VAF). It was implemented as a post-COVID initiative to encourage audiences back into cinemas. Its success relied on three key factors: the availability of attractive films, the willingness of cinemas to participate, and a consistent release schedule with monthly film releases. VAF’s analysis showed a positive impact, particularly through broad promotional support.

Ireland – Where to watch Ireland? An aggregator site for finding domestic film in cinemas and on streaming

By Judith Pernin 

The national screen agency Screen Ireland aims to promote domestic films and build audiences, especially for Screen Ireland-funded works, via a number of programs. The website WheretowatchIreland seeks to tackle the issue of film discoverability across cinemas and streaming platforms by gathering information in one place about where to watch Irish television drama, animations, documentaries, and fiction films. The website organizes films into collections according to genres and types of audiences (Family Favorites, Oscar-nominated films). Website users can also find out about new releases in the “Coming soon” tab, and they can create a personal account to follow selected films. The website provides a community for film fans who can connect, create a profile, and compare notes on films. Built by entertainment tech company usheru, the website gathers analytics from a wide range of providers, collecting data for 40 international and domestic streaming services and for movie theaters across the island of Ireland.

Lithuania – Bringing cinema to people through Cinema Caravan and open-air screening events

By Ruta Kiaupaite & Romanas Matulis 

Kino Pavasaris is a major film festival in Lithuania that engages the Lithuanian public not only during the festival but also with several initiatives at different times of the year. During the summer season, the so-called “Cinema Caravan” travels throughout Lithuania, showing films in regional areas and small towns that do not have cinemas nearby. Free screenings are held on mobile screens in open squares or in parks and meadows, often accompanied by the filmmakers themselves, who engage with the audience after the screening. With “Cinema Under the Stars,” Kino Pavasaris engages audiences in Vilnius with special screenings during the summer. Similarly, the Silver Crane Film Awards host the “Silver Crane Nights.” Kino Pavasaris is a member of the Baltic Film & Creative Tech Cluster.

Portugal – Information & Communication Clubs

By Maria José Brites & Manuel José Damásio 

Within the National Strategy for Citizenship Education, the Portuguese Ministry of Education has recognized Information and Communication Clubs (IC Clubs)—including school newspapers, blogs, podcasts, radio, and TV projects—as key instruments for promoting film and media literacy and active citizenship in schools. In this context, the Directorate-General for Education (DGE) and the Centre for Research in Applied Communication, Culture, and New Technologies (CICANT) at Universidade Lusófona established a cooperation framework linking the IC Clubs network with the research project YouNDigital – Youth, News, and Digital Citizenship. This partnership aimed to reinforce digital, film, and media literacies among young people through participatory and practice-based approaches throughout the school year of 2024-2025.

A series of seven online webinars/masterclasses and one in-person event, reaching around 550 participants in total, focused on core media literacy themes such as ethics, copyright, and the future of information in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Building on YouNDigital’s results, CICANT has also developed training modules on algorithms, diversity, and digital ethics, delivered to professionals in education, media, health, and justice. These actions illustrate how academic research can inform evidence-based policy and practice, fostering a more inclusive and participatory film industry in Portugal.